Description
How can governments build innovative capacity to improve public outcomes and ultimately improve the lives of all within society? The OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation is developing an Innovative Capacity Framework (the Framework) which aims to help governments understand the aspects which influence the capacity of the public sector to use innovation to achieve public outcomes. This public engagement aims to get your perspectives on this framework to ensure it is practical, comprehensive and helpful.
The Framework builds on previous OECD innovation and public governing frameworks and models, while recognising that innovation does not occur in a vacuum – it needs to be embedded as part of the overall public governing system (including in people management, regulatory frameworks, budgeting etc).
To help countries understand and apply the Framework, we have developed a working paper which explores foundational frameworks and methodologies connected to innovation in the public sector, key factors to consider when developing and supporting innovative capacity and the underlying rationale and necessity for innovation across public sector systems.
The Framework is intended to be contextualised and tailored to the system or purpose of interest. While many governments are looking for practical frameworks to assist them in increasing their organisational innovative capacity, or the capacity of central public administration, it is also relevant to consider improving various policy domain systems. All public domain systems (for example, health, education, migration etc) have the potential to create more value if their innovative capacity is clarified and strengthened, and as such the Framework can be adapted to apply to such systems. The types of data, and level of focus may shift depending on what is being examined.
We are looking for input on the Framework and working paper to ensure it:
In the "old" day we never talked about innovation projects. We talked about improvements and change. We hoped some might be innovation. The OECD seems to have ignored 50 years of work on improvement as it is now one variation of innovation. I argue .... no. Improvement is vital and uses different tools and philosophies versus innovation. The logic here is flawed.... innovation projects lead to opportunities of improvement. Improvement projects led to improvements.